Common Misconceptions About Lane Splitting

By Peter DePaolis
Attorney

Lane splitting is a controversial practice that often sparks debate among motorists, motorcyclists, and lawmakers. While some argue it improves traffic flow, others highlight the dangers lane splitting creates and the legal complications it poses. This article addresses common misconceptions about lane splitting, explains its legality in Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, and outlines how personal injury cases may arise from accidents involving lane splitting.

What is Lane Splitting?

Lane splitting is the practice of a motorcyclist riding between lanes of slow-moving or stopped traffic. This is often done in heavy traffic to bypass congestion or avoid being stuck behind slower vehicles. While lane splitting may appear to be a convenient solution for motorcyclists, it presents significant safety risks, as drivers in adjacent lanes may not expect or see motorcycles weaving through traffic.

Some common scenarios where lane splitting occurs include:

  • Riding between vehicles during traffic jams to reach the front of a traffic light.
  • Maneuvering between lanes on highways to avoid slow-moving vehicles.
  • Navigating through standstill traffic to avoid idling.

Despite its prevalence in some regions, lane splitting is considered illegal and dangerous in many states, including D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.

Is Lane Splitting Legal in D.C., Maryland, or Virginia?

In Washington, D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, lane splitting is explicitly illegal. Motorcyclists are required to follow the same traffic rules as other vehicles, which means they must remain within their designated lane at all times.

However, there are situations where a motorist who forces a motorcyclist to lane split could still be found at fault in an accident. For example:

  • Sudden lane changes: If a driver abruptly changes lanes without signaling and a motorcyclist lane-splitting to avoid an obstacle is hit, the driver may share liability.
  • Reckless driving: Drivers who create unsafe conditions, such as tailgating or cutting off motorcyclists, could be held accountable for accidents, even if lane splitting occurred.

Understanding the legality and liability in lane-splitting  these cases is critical for filing personal injury claims.

Misconception 1: Lane Splitting Allows for a Faster Flow of Traffic

One common misconception is that lane splitting helps motorcyclists navigate traffic more efficiently, allowing for a smoother and faster flow. While this may seem logical, the reality is that lane splitting increases the risk of collisions:

  • Drivers may not anticipate motorcycles weaving between lanes, leading to sideswipe accidents.
  • Sudden stops or starts in traffic can leave motorcyclists vulnerable to rear-end collisions or being sandwiched between vehicles.

Even if a motorcyclist believes they are reducing traffic delays, the legal and safety risks far outweigh any perceived benefits.

Misconception 2: Lane Filtering is Allowed

Another misconception is that lane filtering, where motorcyclists ride between lanes of stationary vehicles during standstill traffic, is a legal or safer alternative to lane splitting. In D.C., Maryland, and Virginia, lane filtering is also illegal.

Motorcyclists are required to stay within their lane, even in standstill traffic. Filtering can still lead to:

  • Collisions with vehicles unexpectedly opening doors or moving.
  • Misjudgments of the space between vehicles, leading to scratches or crashes.

While some states and countries allow lane filtering under specific conditions, it remains prohibited in this region.

Misconception 3: Lane Splitting Helps to Reduce Congestion

Some argue that lane splitting alleviates congestion by removing motorcycles from traffic lanes. However, this practice can create new dangers:

  • Unpredictable lane changes: Drivers frequently switch lanes in heavy traffic, which can lead to collisions with motorcyclists attempting to split lanes.
  • Obstructed views: Larger vehicles can block a driver’s view of a motorcyclist moving between lanes, increasing the chance of accidents.

Although lane splitting may reduce congestion in theory, the safety risks far outweigh the benefits.

Is Lane Splitting Being Considered as Lawful in the Future for D.C., Maryland, or Virginia?

Currently, there is no active legislation in D.C., Maryland, or Virginia to legalize lane splitting. While other states, such as California, have introduced laws allowing lane splitting under specific conditions, this practice remains prohibited in this region due to the inherent safety risks and potential for liability disputes.

Motorcyclists and drivers alike are encouraged to stay updated on any changes in legislation, but for now, lane splitting remains illegal in all three jurisdictions.

Call to Action: Protect Your Rights After a Lane-Splitting Accident

If you’ve been involved in an accident with a motorcyclist who was lane splitting, or if you are a motorcyclist who was forced into lane splitting due to another driver’s negligence, you may have a personal injury case.

At Koonz McKenney Johnson & DePaolis LLP, our experienced personal injury lawyers understand the complexities of these cases. We are here to protect your rights, ensure accountability, and help you pursue compensation for your injuries.Contact us today for a free consultation to discuss your case. Let us help you navigate your legal options with confidence.

About the Author
Peter DePaolis joined the firm in 1980 and has since represented a large number of individuals involved in automobile collisions, truck accidents, bus crashes, defective products, and medical malpractice cases. A significant portion of Mr. DePaolis’ practice is devoted to working on behalf of people suffering from asbestosis, mesothelioma, and other asbestos-related cancers. He has led his firm’s fight against the asbestos industry and has recovered over $30 million in damages for asbestos victims and their families.